Archive for the ‘Music Industry’ Category

Where have all the superstars gone?

Posted by Music Careers On October - 18 - 2007

Michael Jackson, Madonna, Elvis Presley, The Beatles, Mariah Carey, Celine Dion, Whitney Houston, Garth Brooks… what do they have in common? They are the biggest names in and each one of them had sold over 100 million records (and counting) in their music careers.

With the music industry’s plummeting sales, popularity of digital music, the offset of piracy in recorded sounds and the current hip music’s lack of worldwide mass appeal, will their ever be another soundtrack to be released to ever grace the top of the charts and be as phenomenal like Titanic? Will their be another showdown of Divas on the records and radio charts? Will an album released by the likes of Justin Timberlake or 50 cent, even get at least 50% of sales, a Jacko album would get 20 years ago?

The truth is, today’s has lost it’s glory and has lost most of its much treasured , and their replacements have so much to work for, if they really are keen and serious about attaining those achievements that their predecessors gained.

The prodigy’s have never come yet.

The question remains, will there be a chance for one specific music album to be release for this decade to ever reach at least 20 million copies of sales in a year? It was just a piece of cheesecake for the likes of Carey or Dion to reach that goal like 10 years ago. Remember the time when boybands gets all the scream and girls go ga-ga when they sing those cheesy yet contagious hits. That was pop music at its peak. That was the time when pop music literally means popular.

Why don’t we see today’s music heriones ever reach that worldwide mainstream appeal that made Janet or Alanis, a household name. All we see are one-hit wonders who would top the charts today and be gone forever the next day.

Will Beyonce, Avril or Christina be able to take on the challenge? Or do we still have to call in Ms. Britney or the Spice Girls perhaps to bring some spice and get those million-selling albums burning up the charts again and create a phenomenon that only these does….

For more education on careers in the music industry, check out: http://www.music-career-guide.com

***

Like this blog?... Buy me a coffee or a tip towards studio time.

is an analysis of the economic and cultural forces affecting the marketing of and how the industry has always responded in a dysfunctional and short-sighted manner to those changes. The book ends with an acknowledgment that the is enduring a rebirth and that although no one can predict what the new world of music will look like, we can at least be assured of its continued existence.

The author is a 30-year veteran of the and writes in the disappointed tone of a family member who can’t quite grok watching a self-destructive relative implode through bad choices. He states that the issue is not that music sucks but that the music you hear through typical media outlets is, for the most part, homogeneous and dull.

Music has been a commodity for thousands of years, so the concept of making money from the creation, performance, and distribution of music is not a new one. The itself, however, has never been terribly artist-friendly. Many of the great musicians on the Chess jazz label, for example, actually owed money to their label at the end of their careers! We’re talking Etta James and Bo Diddley here. Rock and rap labels were not much more forthcoming with their artists. Apparently, no one told the musicians that the piles of coke in their dressing rooms and the limo ride to the Grammys came out of the band’s royalties. Bordowitz points out that you can hardly blame the labels: they are businesses and thus the bottom line supersedes love of music in this industry where the major players are publicly owned and thus responsible for favorable quarterly reports to their shareholders.

The book contains an in-depth and business-oriented analysis of the corporate aspect of the music business: the mergers (there are only four major labels now), the basic structure of a band’s management, A&R, and promotion (all of these people have to be paid!), and the emphasis of video in marketing. The latter is interesting: artists such as Milli Vanilli and Ashlee Simpson being caught with their pants down, lip-syncing… but who cares? They look good on camera! The major labels use voice manipulation to remedy problems created by artists who can’t sing as good as they look.

As margins shrink and the audience’s entertainment dollar is increasingly fragmented, the larger companies become increasingly risk-adverse, thus perpetuating the cycle of all bands sounding the same. For example, in the 80s, REM blew up out of Athens, GA. So the labels sent A&R people to Athens to sign anyone else who sounded similar. The same thing happened in 90s Seattle with grunge. Now, it is artists who are popular on Radio Disney. The major labels have either completely dispensed with artist development, or cherry-pick those who have already been developed by . The author laments that Bruce Springsteen would have been dropped in today’s quick-buck climate.

Bordowitz is particularly disappointed with the ‘ prideful responses to a recent challenge to its financial hegemony: file sharing. Although one study shows that 70% of those who illegally downloaded music went on to purchase the CD, the industry has attacked these (mostly) young people by slapping fines on them, upwards of several thousand dollars. These downloaders are music fans. Can you imagine if another industry behaved like this? If people who sold apples attacked and fined customers who liked, say, apple sauce? Ridiculous.

Other changes in the music business landscape are the centralization (and attendant risk-adverse behavior) of terrestrial radio, the advent of internet and satellite radio, the disappearing distribution outlets replaced by the overweening and arch-conservative influence of Wal-Mart, and I-Pods and their clones.

The changing demographics of the audience are discussed as well. The majors typically aim their marketing at the 12 – 25 year old group, but these consumers spend their entertainment dollar also on video games, cell phones, DVDs, etc. Each of these products gives the perception of hours more entertainment than purchasing a CD. Additionally, with the decline in art and music funding in schools, this group has little or no exposure to anything other than what the popular media offers it. On the other end of the spectrum lies the 30 – 56 year old demographic. These consumers still purchases CDs but are not as easy to compartmentalize as their younger counterparts. Their tastes are broader and more sophisticated. However, when 5% of the new releases each year actually make a profit – and thus support the release and distribution of the other 95% — one can see why the majors would focus on a blockbuster sale to their younger customers.

Bordowitz sees a sustainable model for the music industry in the book business, where companies can sustain themselves with sales of 30-40,000 copies and an occasional bestseller. Smaller runs and the company breaks even. Of course, this is not as sexy as the current high roller adventure of the music business and there are still issues of the changing technology. This is the author’s suggested model for the future, but even he, with his seasoned experience in the business from artists to label to management to production, cannot predict what will happen next.

This book would make a great text for a Business of Music class… or would that perpetuate the problem? Certainly, musicians should read this. Know thy enemy!

Written by Hank Bordowitz

For more education on careers in the music industry, check out: http://www.music-career-guide.com

***

Like this blog?... Buy me a coffee or a tip towards studio time.

About Me

Here is something about me..

Twitter

    Photos

    Activate the Flickrss plugin to see the image thumbnails!